Ethics is hard, and stuff

Google, owners of Blogger, are apparently refusing to take down blogs run by some Australian and New Zealand neo-Nazi groups, despite getting numerous complaints about them. Google apparently is trying to defend the neo-Nazis’ rights to free speech. Of course, it’s well known that Google does censor or remove the blogs of Chinese citizens if the Chinese government tells them they have to. So what is the right thing for Google to do here?

On the one hand, you have the situation with China. If Google wants to let any Chinese citizens at all have access to their services, they have to play ball with the government there and censor things. Google is, one might argue, supporting a totalitarian government in oppressing their people by doing this (and not Google alone – MSN, Yahoo, and many others do the same). But isn’t letting them have some access to these services better than none at all? Or is that a company cop-out to let them try to make more money off the Chinese?

On the other side, you have the Down Under neo-Nazis. Clearly, they spread hate speech and what most any sane person recognizes as an evil ideology. But they live in countries that have free speech. Taking away that right is, most would agree, ethically wrong. Once you take free speech away from one person or group, what is to stop you from taking it away from others? Free speech exists as an ideal to give voice and power to the minority, to help keep them from being oppressed. It’s a slippery slope there.

Other companies have removed blogs and sites run by neo-Nazis. As private companies offering a service, it is their right (and Google’s, as well), but it is also their right not to do that. Google can certainly claim that they are sticking up for the free speech rights of those who already have them, and obeying the law when they deal with those that don’t. But what is the right thing for them to do?

So, what I’ve learned from thinking this over:

1. Ethics sucks ass.

2. The Chinese government and neo-Nazis should all die in a fire.

Advertisements

~ by mattbear on October 27, 2006.

3 Responses to “Ethics is hard, and stuff”

  1. […] On the one hand, you have the situation with China. If Google wa … Do you agree that post is interesting?Link to original article […]

  2. And all i can hear out of that is a bit of Johnny Cash brother Mattbear. I full agree with you on the point of burning in the Fire. I would say that in these times and days, china however is a long term concern and that the people who endorse these kinds of shit can maybe take a look at some Immediate needs. N. Korea for one.. Again and the wonderful FusterCluck in the Barren Jungle. I’m glad google is standing up for getting information in thru the walls, cause as I’ve seen it. The chinese have been over the walls this whole time. Something for use to just worry ourselves about.

    /me shrugs. Heck if I know 😛 I’m not tall enough to ride that ride.. 😛

    lp

  3. sorry to jump back in here on this one.

    I want to bring this up.: http://www.space.com/news/061026_gore_space.html

    Only cause even tho he maybe one of the sharpest marbles on the planet, gore did have something to say that does make sense.

    Note however, I still dont vote for the guy, but everynow and then I have to point out a nugget of wisdom.

    😀

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: